Sat, 07 Apr 2007
At the House of Lords debate on
Police:
DNA Database on the 2007-03-08, Baroness Scotland of Asthal
(Minister of State, Home Office) stated that “[t]here were nearly 3.8
million persons on the DNA database as at the end of January 2007”,
confirmed that “each sample is kept on the database indefinitely” and
explained “we should be clear that negotiations on the Prum treaty have
not been completed” (the Prum treaty is a European treaty, which gives
European member states direct access to national DNA records).
In other news last month, we
learn
that “five civil servants who help run the national DNA database have
been suspended after being accused of industrial espionage” but don't
worry as “[t]he Home Office insisted there was no question information
held on the database had been 'compromised'”
The Home Office published a consultation on
Modernising
Police Powers: Review of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)
1984 (closing date for responses: 2007-05-31) in which it
suggests the creation of short term holding facilities (STHF) in
shopping centres: “The function of the STHF would be to confirm the
identity of the suspect and process the person by reporting for
summons/charging by post, a penalty notice or other disposal. Persons
detained would be subject to detention up to a maximum period of 4
hours to enable fingerprinting, photographing and DNA
sampling. The STHF would not be used in cases where the
arresting officer considers that an investigation was required and
authority to transfer a person from a STHF to a designated police
station would require the authority of an Inspector.” The document goes
as far as suggesting to remove all exisiting limitations on taking DNA
samples: “Is there scope to populate identification databases and
remove unnecessary operational constraints on the extent to which
police are able to use fingerprints etc. to prevent, detect and
investigate crime?”
(Background information on DNA:
Should
the Police keep your DNA forever?)
